Visions of Progress and the Progressive Paradox

I’m going to keep this to the point.

  1. Over the past couple decades, the Democratic Party has been less tight-knit than the Republican Party in America.
  2. This is in part because no coherent vision is shared by the Democratic Party, as it is made up of groups with sometimes-strained ideological overlap.
  3. Progressives working on the vanguard for change are inherently disadvantaged when it comes to presenting a vision of the future to work towards, because
  4. Conservatives can easily present a vision of the future based on the past, which is familiar to all.
  5. Therefore the burden falls upon the progressives to work hard to articulate a vision for a new future, rather than a continuation of the past.

Though we might share common values on these topics, none of us know what a truly multicultural, sexually tolerant, environmentally-sustainable, poverty-free America would look like on a day to day level. And so while our values remain inspiring and a source of action, when it comes to mapping and communicating a vision for the general public, tangible experiences–the allure of the known–comes to the fore, and people prefer what has come before.

I don’t believe any vision has been articulated in a cogent, comprehensive, and compelling way so as to become the dominant progressive agenda in America. Maybe this is due to a particular arrangement of power in America today, where fracture has kept progressives from agreeing with one another on what issues are most important. Maybe that vision simply hasn’t arrived yet. Et cetera–there are lots of possible reasons.

I can make a list of values to arrive at a “cluster definition” of what this agenda might look like. But vagueness isn’t suited for legislative success.

It seems like I’m saying we need a ten-year plan, with numbers and graphs and specific enumerations and details. But therein lies the progressive paradox at the core of our discussion.

Progressives embrace change. They live in the moment and for the future, rather than the past. Fixing an agenda or a vision, however, means shying away from fluidity and embracing a top-down formula where actions are predefined by the agenda. Something’s gotta give–but what?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

This is Ashok.

reality in bits: economics, technology, and thought

Notes on a Theory...

Thoughts on politics, law, & social science

Nicole Gaddie

Journalist | Golfer | Storyteller | @NicoleGaddie

A kitchen for every pot

Public housing, people and policy

99 is not 100

"It's not about trash, not about waste. It’s about how we’ve chosen to live.”

TechCrunch

Startup and Technology News

SHAM Lifestyle

SHAM Lifestyle Agency.

The Belle Jar

"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath

Burly's Baseball Musings

News and Jaundiced Views on the National Pastime

Sad Old Bastard Radio

Broadcasting sad sounds for sad old bastards and reviewing live music around the Bay Area

dvdsn dvdsn

work, thoughts, translations

Collectively Speaking

A Blog of The Women's Collective

Another World Is Happening

and I want to learn about it

FiveThirtyEight

Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight uses statistical analysis — hard numbers — to tell compelling stories about politics, sports, science, economics and culture.

dc young entrepreneurs

You're an entrepreneur. We're your support team.

Grantland

Sports and pop culture from our rotating cast of writers

%d bloggers like this: