Direct Democracy in the Online Age

America is not a democracy.

I know what you’re thinking–okay, the PRISM stuff is a little weird, and yeah, Citizen’s United is messed up and we’re leaning towards oligarchy, but it’s not THAT bad. You’re not wrong, of course. But even in the mythical time-before-corruption when our politicians were pure and true to their wives… we weren’t a democracy.

We’re a representative democracy. As a republic, we elect people to make the choices of government for us. We delegate, mostly because we have to; various hurdles make the alternative–direct democracy–difficult to envision. When the Constitution was drafted, direct democracy couldn’t have worked because it would have taken so long for any decision to be made. With no internet, no telegrams, no cars or trains, information would be so slow to reach citizens, and their responses so slow to reach the executive, that of course it made more sense to elect a trusted representative to make decisions quickly.

But those barriers have fallen, and while politicians love to talk about e-governance and transparency, so far as I know no legislative candidate has yet taken the next logical step: promising to tether their vote to online plebiscite (restricted to registered voters in their district, probably). This would be the ultimate way of handing power to the people. It wouldn’t take a technological genius to make this work; you’d need some stronger-than-usual verification measures, but nothing mind-blowing.

Though the internet has removed the time-element barrier to direct democracy, another has arisen: issue expertise. When I posed to several of my peers the possibility of a legislator tethering her/his vote to online plebiscite, their response was overwhelmingly–and surprisingly, to me–negative. Their criticism hinged on the idea that the common person is not capable of making the decisions required of a member of Congress.

This assumption is lamentable. It precludes broad swaths of the population from having their voices heard, and ignores the benefits from perfect (or near perfect) information that would follow from such a system. Presently, here’s what you can expect:

  1. Candidate runs with a platform that approximates what he thinks the mass voters support.
  2. Candidate closest to mass voters wins.
  3. Elected legislator frequently betrays campaign promises and acts in ways that benefit a select few (the moneyed, mainly). The populace potentially suffers from programs carried out against the common will.
  4. The legislator is replaced and the cycle starts all over again.

Right now, the ways of knowing where your fellow constituents fall on an issue are highly indeterminate, both from the perspective of the legislator and the common citizen. Both parties would benefit from knowing what percentage of the populace supported this or that measure.

I do acknowledge that navigating, much less understanding, the labyrinthine world of American federal government is probably a much more complicated task than ever before. But the idea that we’re not capable of governing ourselves might be even more sorry.

 

to be finished later

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

This is Ashok.

reality in bits: economics, technology, and thought

Notes on a Theory...

Thoughts on politics, law, & social science

Nicole Gaddie

Journalist | Golfer | Storyteller | @NicoleGaddie

A kitchen for every pot

Public housing, people and policy

99 is not 100

"It's not about trash, not about waste. It’s about how we’ve chosen to live.”

TechCrunch

Startup and Technology News

SHAM Lifestyle

SHAM Lifestyle Agency.

The Belle Jar

"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath

Burly's Baseball Musings

News and Jaundiced Views on the National Pastime

Sad Old Bastard Radio

Broadcasting sad sounds for sad old bastards and reviewing live music around the Bay Area

dvdsn dvdsn

work, thoughts, translations

Collectively Speaking

A Blog of The Women's Collective

Another World Is Happening

and I want to learn about it

FiveThirtyEight

Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight uses statistical analysis — hard numbers — to tell compelling stories about politics, sports, science, economics and culture.

dc young entrepreneurs

You're an entrepreneur. We're your support team.

Grantland

Sports and pop culture from our rotating cast of writers

%d bloggers like this: