Monthly Archives: October 2013

Here are the Opening Day payrolls for every Major League Baseball team for the 2013 season, ranked in increasing order by $/win, except for the Yankees at the top, who we all get to cruelly laugh at. You could also think of the rank as wins per dollar spent. (All data at bottom; WAR is fWAR from; sorry the table doesn’t display perfectly.)

Right off the bat, you’ll notice our leaders in this department are the two worst teams in baseball: the Astros and the Marlins. What! you are heard to declare. Why’d you make a table with such bollocks at the top!

Well, because bad as they may be, they may at least be smart about it. Like Philadelphia in the NBA, Houston has been very upfront about its decision to pursue a long-term rebuilding project that relies on stashing prospects and avoiding unnecessary and frustrating mediocrity. The Marlins probably deserve a little more acrimony, based on owner Jeffrey Loria’s general meddling and misanthropy, but could be said to be pursuing a similar strategy. These organizations are doing much better, by this metric, than the Phillies, Giants, Angels, White Sox, or Blue Jays, all of whom are stuck in a high-priced purgatory.

Our champions by this metric are the low-budget, high-performing contenders out of Oakland and Tampa. This comes as no surprise to anyone who has been following baseball since the Rays’ surprise run to the 2008 World Series. How these organizations perform at such a high level is the subject for a longer post…but it’s too tempting not to give a cursory run-through now. (The Pirates, Indians, and Braves are also model organizations in this regard, though they do not face as harsh of budget constraints as the A’s or Rays.) Common factors include:

  • Relying on a young, cost-controlled core
  • Defensive shifting (Rays and Pirates out front here)
  • Matching your pitcher types with defensive skillsets or environment (i.e., surrounding sinkerballers with good infielders, or the A’s reliance on fly-ball pitchers in light of’s cavernous interior)
  • Aggressively pursuing platoon advantages (Indians and A’s ranked 1-2 in league for platoon advantage frequency at the plate)
  • Courting the almighty walk… (Rays, 1st; A’s, 3rd; Indians, 4th; Red Sox, who also had a very good year on the field and in the front office, 5th; Braves, 6th)
  • …and not overpaying for singles (none of the five organizations identified ranks in the top 10 for league batting average)

Fewer common strengths emerge on the pitching side. The A’s and Braves don’t walk anyone, I guess. The A’s, Indians, Rays, and Pirates have all had great success with reclamation projects (Colon, Kazmir, Rodney, Liriano, respectively), and all rank in the top half of the league for under-25 pitcher fWAR.

The past ten years have seen an explosion into research onto how to evaluate the disparate parts that make up a baseball team. The digitization of discrete events has played a huge role in this, culminating in that holy grail of holistic player evaluation, WAR.

However, organizations looking for that 2% advantage will be hungrily eyeing the number at the bottom of this page: 0.71. That’s the r-squared value for the relationship between WAR and wins. R-squareds show the fit between two sets of data. WAR is the cutting edge of player evaluation, but it comes up short in evaluating the entire system of play. There will always be an element of luck in play, but the team that can explain and explore the additional 0.29 gap between WAR and wins will be in a position to succeed (and I believe the smartest teams in the league are already doing so by pursuing the strategies above).

In order to do so, I suspect that the next generation of analysis will have to a step further and look at the synthesis or interaction between these parts. How do the front office, managerial style, on-field decisions, and playing environment (field and even fans or travel conditions) interact? Many of the tactics detailed above have started down that path. Examining player statistics individually, without respect to the environments those statistics are put up in, will not yield the insight that platooning two players might be more productive than just starting the “overall” better one. Pitch selection based in part on defense–and defensive shifting based on batter or pitcher tendencies–is another inroad to be exploited. There is an entire program of research to be explored, based on principles of interaction, endogeneity, and holism.

Though neither the Rays, nor the A’s, Indians, Pirates, or Braves remain in the playoffs, their victories may be ultimately more impressive than whatever emerges out of the beautiful, happily random luckfest that is October baseball (I plan, in my fantasy future where I have oodles of time, to examine whether money prevails in the playoffs more often than it does in the regular season–if there is some sort of “star factor”). Of course it would be cool if we started placing more emphasis on regular season champions, but here’s to the Rays, this year’s champion of being good and cheap.

Opening Day Wins WAR $/Win $/WAR
Yankees $228,835,490 85.00 37.90 $2,692,182.24 $6,037,875.73
Astros $22,062,600 51.00 20.90 $432,600.00 $1,055,626.79
Marlins $36,341,900 62.00 17.20 $586,159.68 $2,112,901.16
Rays $57,895,272 92.00 45.00 $629,296.43 $1,286,561.60
Athletics $60,664,500 96.00 40.90 $631,921.88 $1,483,239.61
Indians $77,772,800 92.00 38.10 $845,356.52 $2,041,280.84
Pirates $79,555,000 94.00 40.10 $846,329.79 $1,983,915.21
Padres $67,143,600 76.00 26.80 $883,468.42 $2,505,358.21
Braves $89,778,192 96.00 36.00 $935,189.50 $2,493,838.67
Royals $81,491,725 86.00 43.80 $947,578.20 $1,860,541.67
Rockies $71,924,071 74.00 36.00 $971,946.91 $1,997,890.86
Mets $73,396,649 74.00 29.30 $991,846.61 $2,505,005.09
Mariners $72,031,143 71.00 27.70 $1,014,523.14 $2,600,402.27
Orioles $90,993,333 85.00 38.30 $1,070,509.80 $2,375,805.04
Diamondbacks $89,100,500 81.00 38.30 $1,100,006.17 $2,326,383.81
Brewers $82,976,944 74.00 29.80 $1,121,310.05 $2,784,461.21
Twins $75,802,500 66.00 27.50 $1,148,522.73 $2,756,454.55
Cardinals $115,222,086 97.00 42.20 $1,187,856.56 $2,730,381.18
Reds $107,491,305 90.00 36.30 $1,194,347.83 $2,961,192.98
Rangers $114,090,100 91.00 47.30 $1,253,737.36 $2,412,052.85
Nationals $116,056,769 86.00 34.90 $1,349,497.31 $3,325,408.85
Red Sox $150,655,500 97.00 56.10 $1,553,149.48 $2,685,481.28
Cubs $104,304,676 66.00 26.50 $1,580,373.88 $3,936,025.51
Blue Jays $117,527,800 74.00 27.20 $1,588,213.51 $4,320,875.00
Tigers $148,414,500 93.00 52.10 $1,595,854.84 $2,848,646.83
Angels $127,896,250 78.00 40.00 $1,639,695.51 $3,197,406.25
Giants $140,264,334 76.00 39.50 $1,845,583.34 $3,550,995.80
White Sox $119,073,277 63.00 26.30 $1,890,052.02 $4,527,501.03
Phillies $165,385,714 73.00 28.00 $2,265,557.73 $5,906,632.64
Dodgers $216,597,577 92.00 47.00 $2,354,321.49 $4,608,459.09
Average $103,358,204 $81 $36 $1,271,566 $2,907,287
0.107427 0.197857

Funnily enough, this suggests that (this year, at least), money was better at buying WAR than it was at buying actual wins. In case you’re curious, here’s the leaguewide r-squared for the relationship between WAR (x) and wins (y).


World Series picks, per

LAD: 5

STL: 3


BOS: 10

DET: 8

OAK: 5

Notice anything interesting there? There’s the obvious–Boston is the favorite, followed closely by Detroit. But if you take another look, you’ll see that ESPN’s experts favor the American League by a wide margin. Of the 34 analysts surveyed, 23 picked an American League team to win the World Series.

It’s true that the Junior Circuit took the 2013 All-Star game to clinch home-field advantage for the World Series. Home-field advantage does a little bit to explain the discrepancy, but not much. The more salient point is that, since interleague play was introduced in 1997, the AL has outperformed the NL to a pretty astounding degree.

The fact of the matter is that a seven game series is something just shy of a toss-up in terms of determining the more skilled team. And since an NL team is guaranteed to end up in the World Series–even if the league is inferior–it stands to hold something just shy of a 50% chance of winning the World Series, even after accounting for the handicap that the NL may deserve, league-wide. And that handicap may go out the window in the World Series: over that same 15-year span since the introduction of interleague play in 1997, the National League has actually won the majority of World Series, with 8 victories, bookended by the Marlins in 1997 and the Giants in 2012.

So, even though the power of crowds to estimate–for example, the weight of a rhinoceros–is surprisingly precise, it’s unlikely that there’s actually a 23/34 (68%) chance that the American League provides the winner of this year’s Series.

  1. by this river — brian eno
  2. possible music i — jon hassell
  3. days — the kinks
  4. kiss me — sixpence none the richer
  5. sennen — ride
  6. in another way — mbv
  7. leave the planet — galaxie 500
  8. halfway to a threeway — jim o’rourke
  9. campaigner — neil young
This is Ashok.

reality in bits: economics, technology, and thought

Notes on a Theory...

Thoughts on politics, law, & social science

Nicole Gaddie

Journalist | Golfer | Storyteller | @NicoleGaddie

A kitchen for every pot

Public housing, people and policy

99 is not 100

"It's not about trash, not about waste. It’s about how we’ve chosen to live.”


Startup and Technology News

SHAM Lifestyle

SHAM Lifestyle Agency.

The Belle Jar

"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath

Burly's Baseball Musings

News and Jaundiced Views on the National Pastime

Sad Old Bastard Radio

Broadcasting sad sounds for sad old bastards and reviewing live music around the Bay Area

dvdsn dvdsn

work, thoughts, translations

Collectively Speaking

A Blog of The Women's Collective

Another World Is Happening

and I want to learn about it


Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight uses statistical analysis — hard numbers — to tell compelling stories about politics, sports, science, economics and culture.

dc young entrepreneurs

You're an entrepreneur. We're your support team.